
Conversational Control involves two kinds of tactics:
-
Arcing Up – when someone is “at you” with blame, criticism or hostility
-
Arcing Down – when someone “turns away” through silence, avoidance or withdrawal
These fall into two columns—the Arcing Up Column and the Arcing Down Column. But the place where real connection happens is the Middle Column.
A person who seeks to control the conversation will avoid the Middle Column. Instead, they keep control by switching between Arcing Up and Arcing Down—an unfair and adversarial way to communicate.

Conversational Control is the use of speech to sidestep, dominate, or disrupt dialogue—the very thing that builds trust and connection in healthy relationships.
The Middle Column represents the ideal: conversations that promote safety, fairness, and equal participation. Here, people can think, feel, and decide together. It’s the space where teamwork, maturity, and emotional safety can grow.
By contrast, the Arcing Up and Arcing Down columns reveal dysfunctional patterns—focused on winning, withdrawing, or keeping power. These patterns lie at the heart of emotional, verbal, and psychological abuse.
There are different levels of Conversational Control, existing along a continuum. We can all slip into using these tactics at times—because we’re human—but when the behaviour is occasional, it has little lasting impact on the relationship.
Further along the continuum, Conversational Control becomes more skilled and strategic, often used to unsettle, confuse, or dominate. At its most entrenched level, it is no longer merely unfair—it is abusive. Here, Conversational Control forms the foundation of Coercive Control and toxic relationship dynamics.
Understanding these dynamics is the first step toward naming them—and making change possible.
What are Conversational Rights, Conversational Equality and Conversational Control?
Conversations are so important because they are what form and then maintain a relationship with our partners. However, when these conversations are not fair or are disrespectful, at least most of the time, the relationship tips from being equal to unequal and, at the higher end of the spectrum, can even be abusive.
​
Many relationships are not necessarily 'abusive' but are not benefiting both people to the same extent. That is because some conversations are being controlled by one person in a patterned way. It may be unconscious due to poor role modelling, or it can be very conscious and intentional. Either way, one partner will likely feel disrespected and confused about what is happening.
​
​
Conversational Rights mean that a person has the right to be treated with fairness and respect.
​
​
​
You have the right to an emotionally and psychologically safe attitude from the person you are conversing with.
You have the right to collaborative behaviour, to have equal input into the conversation, focus, and attention.
You have the right to the aim of the conversation to be productive with the opportunity to clarify, discuss, explore and disagree.
​
There are four scenarios further down of Conversational Control. In each of them, one person does not have their conversational rights respected enough to make the relationship emotionally intimate, connected, and safe.
Conversational Equality is essential if you want to have an equal relationship.
​
Where there is psychological and emotional safety, respect, patience, empathy, and assumed equality of rights.
​
Where there is mutual engagement, respectful and congruent body language, facial expressions, and verbal tone.
Where there is a productive conversation and it is kept on track. Different perspectives are acknowledged, with apologies given if needed.
​
This means the conversation would aim to come to a win/win outcome, that has taken into consideration both of your perspectives and is suitable for you both. ​

​
​​
Their conversational process is very different from somebody who wants an equal conversation.
They may pretend to have forgotten past discussions, shut down the conversation, or distort what is said for their benefit.
They could force you into an unwanted discussion or one that is circular, complicated, disrespectful, and unhelpful.
They will most likely refuse to resolve the issue and use blame, guilt-tripping, or confusing tactics.
​
Conversational Control is when one person ignores their partner's Conversational Rights.
​
​
Conversational Control means that one partner is not contributing to the conversation fairly and is, often without realising it, using different kinds of tactics to get their needs, but not their partner's. ​
​​
When this happens in a patterned manner it is also a stepping stone for abuse, such as Coercive Control.
Even if it doesn't become abusive, the relationship will be unequal and disconnected. There is overall disrespect in the relationship.
Image by Wynand van Poortvliet
Have a read of this flip book for further information.
Four Scenarios Of Conversational Control




For some further information on Dr Torna Pitman's research on Conversational Control and Coercive Control, please click on the links below:
​
1. PhD The Legacy of Domestic Violence 2010: How the dynamics of abuse continue beyond separation.
​
​
3.Engender Equality's YouTube Channel 2020: 10-part Video Series and Three-Minute Thoughtcasts on Conversational and Coercive Control
​
4.Australian Association Social Workers 2020: 'Let's Cut to the Chase. What we need to know about Conversational Control'.
​
5.ABC Radio North Tasmania 2020: Piia Wirsu interviews Torna, who explains why we need to understand conversational control and coercive control to combat domestic abuse.
​
6.Rule of Thumb Podcast 2021: Penny Terry with the Women's Legal Service Tasmania. Torna is featured in each episode of season two, discussing Coercive Control
​
7.Family Law Pathways Conference 2021: Watch Torna explaining the concepts of family violence and coercive control
​
8.The Trap Podcast 2021: A harm-prevention podcast for Domestic Abuse- hosted by Jess Hill from Victoria Women's Trust
​

